Alltop. I don't know how I got there either.
TwitterCounter for @spostareduro

I'm Getting Married!

newest

comments


« Logo Contest By PixelHead Online | Main | Stumpedia Search Engine Update »

Learning SEO: Homepage Disasters

By Kimberly Bock | March 2, 2008

Homepage Disasters is a “Learning SEO: Keyword Importance” follow up.

In the previous “Keyword Importance” post we discovered that the search query for “diapers” showed the Big Dogs of Diaperville are not doing so well.

I learned since then that their home pages are complete SEO disasters as well.
Learning SEO: Keyword Importance follow up
Oh sorry, wrong disaster

I meant to use this one
Learning SEO: Keyword Importance follow up
Oops, no that one has the right keyword.

Let’s try this again (diaper disasters)
Bush Diaper Disaster

From your “edit” tab in your toolbar, there’s an option that says “find in this page“.

I used this option to analyze the keyword disasters in each.

None of the 3 diaper Dali Lamas realizes keyword importance.

Pampers.com uses the word “diapers” 1 lonely time. The other 2 would rank better for “edible underwear” as they don’t even use the word once. (uh er I’m joking about the edible underwear thing of course)

I was talking with Bill Slawski this morning about the ridiculousness behind their oversights. He was quick to observe the fact that corporations have been known to spend $1,000,000 or more for a 60 second commercial during the Superbowl. Yet they neglect the simplest and cheapest traffic driver at their disposal. SEO. By implementing SEO, which acknowledges keyword importance, they would rank better in the SERPs ultimately driving more traffic and securing more conversions.

These 3 corporations under scrutiny are not reliant on SEO for the bulk of their traffic.

But you are.
Learning SEO: Keyword Importance follow up

Until next time, have fun learning!

Topics: SEO/SEM Training |

2 Responses to “Learning SEO: Homepage Disasters”

  1. Jansie Blom Says:
    March 3rd, 2008 at 12:21 pm

    so what should the keyword density be on a page?

  2. Kimberly Bock Says:
    March 3rd, 2008 at 1:38 pm

    Ah, but that’s yet another post my friend..I’m getting to it. I’m getting to it. :-)

Comments